Captain n coach to appear again in front of review committee

I like the way NDTV is trying to criticise ganguly. click on the link: News is, vide NDTV, that coach Chappell and captain Ganguly will face the review committee all over again, at the end of the ODI series at home against Sri Lanka and South Africa.Indian cricket has come to a pretty pass, if the two seniormost members of the actual team -- its leader, and the head of its back-room staff -- are no better than truant schoolboys who need to be periodically hauled before the headmaster.

Inzamam issue!!!

When I first heard about the Super Series, We were told that players would be selected on their recent performance, performance against Australia, Performance Against Australia in Australia, Here follows this for both Players:
Inzamam's performance in recent year : 704 runs in 18 innings with average of 50.29
Performance Against Australia Overall: 31.97
Against Australia in Australia on his last tour: 198 in 5 matches with average of 39.6

Rahul Dravid's performance in recent year: 623 17 innings, average of 42.13
Against Australia Overall: 29 Against Australia in Australia,
Last 5 innings: 111 at average of 22.2

Mr. Gavaskar I would like to know on what basis Rahul Dravid was prefered over Inzamam in the ODI squad. It's not that I hate Dravid (he is the best player according to me) but when one goes through the criteria to get selected in the team, why had Inzamam been sidelined?

compromise consensus or come-down?

my comments in parantheses: The meeting convened by the BCCI's review committee to go into the coach v captain issue has just ended. This is what the sequence of events has resulted in: Cricket needs to go forward. The coach and captain need to work it out mutually and maintain a professional relationship. (So what was the need for the committee to take this issue up if the captain and coach need to work it out mutually in a professional manner?) The captain, coach and players will be judged on their performance (Was the criteria different previously? Why?) No player (including the captain) or coach will interact with the media. Anyone flouting this will be taken to task (Total gag order. No post-match presentation ceremonies or press conferences? This is the 1975 Emergency re-enacted) Interests of Indian cricket need to be kept in mind (Why not keep in mind the best interests of Singapore cricket?) There has been some miscommunication regarding faking of injuries and whatever was stated was far from the truth (Ergo, Chappell lied when he said that Ganguly was faking an injury in the warm-up game. Isn't that a huge thing to reveal about the man you picked as a national coach? If Chappell has any self-respect, he will quit) The coach and captain have assured the board that they will work together in the interest of Indian cricket (Is it in their best interest to do so? What about personal agendas?) The difference in roles between the captain and the coach is demarcated. We can't throw light on that. (We do not currently have a torchlight available to shed light on that. Alwarpet Aandavas Cricket Club has approached the Madras High Court today with a stay-order to prevent us from shedding any light on any matter, including our elections.) They are confident that they will do it. Both coach and captain are happy with the arrangement and the committee is confident of them working together. (We are one big happy family. Can we please go for a group photograph? Ganguly interjects, no pool table photos this time!)

WHOA there

Indian Express, for some reason, appears to have taken the ongoing developments harder than most -- a veritable flood of 'what the hell is going on' pieces on that site; here for your edification is the latest.
Click the title to read the article

I HATE THIS......it pisses me

Mr Ganguli is the worst batsman in the team in last 3,6,9,12,15,18 months in both tests and odis. He should be sacked immediately.

Compromise that BCCI speaks of will actually be victory of corruption, nepotism, ineptness.

BCCI will not sack Sourav or Greg... for now

I SIMPLY HATE THIS DECISION. click on the title to read the news

Here is the Chappel Way!!!

To read the full article click on the title. Sanjay Manjrekar's comments touched me :
"Here we are then. Which way is Indian cricket going this week? The familiar Indian way or the new Australian way?

I can tell you for sure, we the Indian cricketing fraternity, which includes current players too, have always fantasised going the Australian way. It’s often talked about in close circles, amongst friends and believe it or not, sometimes in hushed tones, as if discussing a conspiracy to overthrow the Government.

But when the time or opportunity comes to actually make this a reality, we turn away from that way, which is basically about doing what is right and chose the road riddled with compromises.

You have seen that approach over the years in the selections of Indian captains."

Please define compromise??-by Prem

Ex-players, says this story, are increasingly speaking out in favor of a compromise. Sample quote:Chetan Chauhan puts it pithily: ‘‘The captain and the coach are two pillars of a team. Remove one and the team will fall on itself. Anything other than a compromise will have a negative impact.’’ Reminds me of this friend who, while discussing marital relations, once made a rather pithy remark on 'compromise' as it applies to marriage: 'It's like this -- I want to go to the movies, he wants to go to the sports bar, so we compromise and both go to the park where we can sit under a tree, feeling miserable but happy the other person is miserable too'.

Ganguly should quit but he has the licence to kill from Dalmiya: Dungarpur

click on the title to read

Bhajji told to shut up!! gets show cause notice

WELL PLAYED BANGALORE

well done b'lore for supporting Chappel...i wish Calcutta learns something from B'lore. click on the title to see the image

The prediction!!!!!!

this is what is going to happen: GANGULY TO RETAIN CAPTAINCY, GREG FIRED!!!! the reason I am certain of this to happen is: Apne Kaptaan Gangu ki achi pehchaan hai--well connected with the BCCI committee. the bookies also r supporting n betting ki ganguly will retian captaincy and it is the coach who will be axed. One thing is for sure that our committee members themselves are well connected with these bookies(they themselves might be bookies) so they won't wanna lose their or their friends(bookies) money. Bookies by now might have even bribed some of the committee members i think bharaat ki JANTA(jo sab kuch dekhkar bhi kuch nahi karti) should stand up now and instead of burning effigies of Greg & Ganguly should first burn effigies of BCCI members.

Shitty guys of Indian circket

News Flashes on the TV suggesting that the team manager proving Chappel wrong. He says Ganguly was always there in all the practise sessions. Now seems Chappel gonna be alone facing the BCCI. I think Greg is being targetted for no reason. It is just that old notion "sachai ki kabhi jeet nahi hoti hai kalyug mein" ...........that is what is happening right now...........those who dare to stand are made scapegoats. I think the TEAM MANAGER & Ganguly AND THE BCCI SELECTORS ARE TRAITORS & are bringing Disgrace to the nation. SHAME oN THEM.

Disappointed Harsha Bhogle

It is a warning for us (fans of cricket)

They are like two kids, says Dalmiya

Read this article

I wish Ganguly is THROWN out!!!

I must admit though that I felt a huge rush of joy on reading GC's email. It will be difficult for Ganguly to wriggle out of this mess. Over the last couple of years, Ganguly's batting has been a disgrace. A monkey on hot bricks is more entertaining

Who leaked the letter to the media?

this CONFIDENTIAL e-mail was sent to Ranbir Singh Mahindra and S K Nair. I fear RSM forwarded this CONFIDENTIAL e-mail to his "boss" Jagmohan Dalmiya, who leaked it CONFIDENTIALLY to the "local" media.

My opinion about Greg-Ganguly spat

i think that now because this email is out in public, BCCI will have to do something.. BUT, since when has BCCI become so responsive to public opinion.. Just like they once had a private coversation with Azhar to reprimand him ( I cant remember the exact details right now) .. cant they say that they have talked to SAurav and he has agreed to mend his ways.. and thus sweep everything under the carpet? After all, the Jaggu mafia is still in charge until next year, no? It is a different issue whether GC will accept it.. I have a sneaky feeling that GC will be sacked.
having this email released won't clear the air. Instead, it might break hearts, and might shatter some people's faith in Indian cricket.
simply removing Ganguly from the captaincy is not good enough. He must be made an example of as to what sort of behavior is completely unacceptable and a DISGRACE TO THE NATION.

Full text of Indian cricket team coach Greg Chappell’s email, in collaboration with India TV Due to comments made by Mr Sourav Ganguly during the press conference following his innings in the recently completed Test match in Bulawayo and the subsequent media speculation I would like to make my position clear on two points. 1. At no stage did I ask Mr Ganguly to step down from the captaincy of the Indian team and; 2. At no stage have I threatened to resign my position as Indian team coach. Mr Ganguly came to me following the recently completed tri-series of one-day matches here in Zimbabwe and asked me to tell him honestly where he stood as a player in my view. I told him that I thought he was struggling as a player and that it was affecting his ability to lead the team effectively and that the pressure of captaincy was affecting his ability to play to his potential. I also told him that his state of mind was fragile and it showed in the way that he made decisions on and off the field in relation to the team, especially team selection. A number of times during the tri-series the tour selectors had chosen a team and announced it to the group only for Sourav to change his mind on the morning of the game and want to change the team. On at least one occasion he did change the team and on the morning of the final I had to talk him out of making another last-minute change that I believe would have destroyed team morale and damaged the mental state of the individuals concerned. I also told Sourav that his nervous state was affecting the team in other ways as he was prone to panic during pressure situations in games and that his nervous demeanour was putting undue pressure on the rest of the team. His nervous pacing of the rooms during our batting in the final plus his desire to change the batting order during our innings in the final had also contributed to nervousness in the players waiting to go in to bat. His reluctance to bat first in games I suggested was also giving wrong signals to the team and the opposition and his nervousness at the crease facing bowlers like Shane Bond from NZ was also affecting morale in the dressing room. On the basis of this and other observations and comments from players in the squad about the unsettling effect Sourav was having on the group I suggested to Sourav that he should consider stepping down from the captaincy at the end of the tour in the interests of the team and in his own best interests if he wanted to prolong his playing career. I told him of my own experiences toward the end of my career and cited other players such as Border, Taylor and Steve Waugh, all of whom struggled with batting form toward the end of their tenure as Australian captain. We discussed other issues in relation to captaincy and the time and effort it took that was eating into his mental reserves and making it difficult to prepare properly for batting in games. He commented that he had enjoyed being free of those responsibilities in the time that he was in Sri Lanka following his ban from international cricket and that he would consider my suggestion. I also raised the matter of selection for the first Test with Sourav and asked him where he thought he should bat. He said ‘number 5’. I told him that he might like to consider opening in the Test as the middle order was going to be a tight battle with Kaif and Yuvraj demanding selection. Sourav asked me if I was serious. I said it was something to be considered, but it had to be his decision. The following day Sourav batted in the match against Zimbabwe ‘A’ team in the game in Mutare. I am not sure of the exact timing of events because I was in the nets with other players when Sourav went in to bat, but the new ball had either just been taken or was imminent when I saw Sourav walking from the field holding his right arm. I assumed he had been hit and made my way to the players’ area where Sourav was receiving treatment from the team physiotherapist, John Gloster. When I enquired as to what had happened Sourav said he had felt a click in his elbow as he played a ball through the leg side and that he thought he should have it investigated. Sourav had complained of pain to his elbow at various stages of the one-day series, but he had resisted having any comprehensive investigation done and, from my observation, had been spasmodic in his treatment habits, often not using ice-packs for the arm that had been prepared for him by John Gloster. I suggested, as had John Gloster, that we get some further tests done immediately. Sourav rejected these suggestions and said he would be ‘fine’. When I queried what he meant by ‘fine’ he said he would be fit for the Test match. I then queried why then was it necessary to be off the field now. He said that he was just taking ‘precautions’. Rather than make a scene with other players and officials in the vicinity I decided to leave the matter and observe what Sourav would do from that point on. After the loss of Kaif, Yuvraj and Karthik to the new ball, Sourav returned to the crease with the ball now around 20 overs old. He struggled for runs against a modest attack and eventually threw his wicket away trying to hit one of the spinners over the leg side. The next day I enquired with a number of the players as to what they had thought of Sourav’s retirement. The universal response was that it was ‘just Sourav’ as they recounted a list of times when Sourav had suffered from mystery injuries that usually disappeared as quickly as they had come. This disturbed me because it confirmed for me that he was in a fragile state of mind and it was affecting the mental state of other members of the squad. When we arrived in Bulawayo I decided I needed to ask Sourav if he had over-played the injury to avoid the danger period of the new ball as it had appeared to me and others within the touring party that he had protected himself at the expense of others. He denied the suggestion and asked why he would do that against such a modest attack. I said that he was the only one who could answer that question. I was so concerned about the affect that Sourav’s actions were having on the team that I decided I could not wait until selection meeting that evening to inform him that I had serious doubts about picking him for the first Test. I explained that, in my view, I felt we had to pick Kaif and Yuvraj following their good form in the one-day series and that Sehwag, Gambhir, Laxman and Dravid had to play. He said that his record was better than Kaif and Yuvraj and that they had not proved themselves in Test cricket. I countered with the argument that they had to be given a chance to prove themselves on a consistent basis or we would never know. I also said that their form demanded that they be selected now. Sourav asked me whether I thought he should be captain of the team. I said that I had serious doubts that he was in the right frame of mind to do it. He asked me if I thought he should step down. I said that it was not my decision to make, that only he could make that decision, but if he did make that decision he had to do it in the right manner or it would have even more detrimental effects than if he didn’t stand down. I said that now was not the time to make the decision but that we should discuss it at the selection meeting to be held later in the day. Sourav then said that if I didn’t want him to be captain that he would inform Rahul Dravid that was going to stand down. I reiterated that it was not my decision to make but he should give it due consideration under the circumstances but not to do it hastily. At that point Sourav went to Rahul and the two of them conferred briefly and then Sourav left the field and entered the dressing room. At that stage I joined the start of the training session. A short time later Mr Chowdhary came on to the field and informed me that Sourav had told him that I did not want him as captain and that Sourav wanted to leave Zimbabwe immediately if he wasn’t playing. I then joined Mr Chowdhary and Rahul Dravid in the dressing room where we agreed that this was not the outcome that any of us wanted and that the ramifications would not be in the best interests of the team. We then spent some time with Sourav and eventually convinced him that he should stay on as captain for the two Tests and then consider his future. In my view it was not an ideal solution but it was better than the alternative of him leaving on a bad note. I believe he has earned the right to leave in a fitting manner. We all agreed that this was a matter that should stay between us and should not, under any circumstances, be discussed with the media. The matter remained quiet until the press conference after the game when a journalist asked Sourav if he had been asked to step down before the Test. Sourav replied that he had but he did not want to elaborate and make an issue of it. I was then called to the press conference where I was asked if I knew anything of Sourav being asked to step down before the game. I replied that a number of issues had been raised regarding selection but as they were selection matters I did not wish to make any further comment. Apart from a brief interview on ESPN before which I emphasized that I did not wish to discuss the issue because it was a selection matter I have resisted all other media approaches on the matter. Since then various reports have surfaced that I had threatened to resign. I do not know where that rumour has come from because I have spoken to no one in regard to this because I have no intention of resigning. I assume that some sections of the media, being starved of information, have made up their own stories. At the completion of the Test match I was approached by VVS Laxman with a complaint that Sourav had approached him on the eve of the Test saying that I had told Sourav that I did not want Laxman in the team for Test matches. I denied that I had made such a remark to Sourav, or anybody else for that matter, as, on the contrary, I saw Laxman as an integral part of the team. He asked how Sourav could have said what he did. I said that the only way we could go to the bottom of the matter was to speak to Sourav and have him repeat the allegation in front of me. I arranged for a meeting with the two of them that afternoon. The meeting took place just after 6pm in my room at the Rainbow Hotel in Bulawayo. I told Sourav that Laxman had come to me complaining that Sourav had made some comments to Laxman prior to the Test. I asked Sourav if he would care to repeat the comment in my presence. Sourav then rambled on about how I had told him that I did not see a place for Laxman in one-day cricket, something that I had discussed with Sourav and the selection panel and about which I had spoken to Laxman at the end of the Sri Lankan tour. Sourav mentioned nothing about the alleged conversation regarding Laxman and Test cricket even when I pushed him on it later in the discussion. As we had to leave for a team function we ended the conversation without Sourav adequately explaining his comments to Laxman. Again, this is not an isolated incident because I have had other players come to me regarding comments that Sourav had made to them that purports to be comments from me to Sourav about the particular player. In each case the comments that Sourav has passed on to the individual are figments of Sourav’s imagination. One can only assume that he does it to unnerve the individual who, in each case, has been a middle order batsman. Sourav has missed the point of my discussions with him on this matter. It has less to do with his form than it does with his attitude toward the team. Everything he does is designed to maximise his chance of success and is usually detrimental to someone else’s chances. Despite meeting with him in Mumbai after his appointment as captain and speaking with him about these matters and his reluctance to do the preparation and training that is expected of everyone else in the squad he continues to set a bad example. Greg King’s training reports continue to show Sourav as the person who does the least fitness and training work based on the criterion that has been developed by the support staff to monitor the work load of all the players. We have also developed parameters of batting, bowling, fielding and captaincy that we believe embodies the ‘Commitment to Excellence’ theme that I espoused at my interview and Sourav falls well below the acceptable level in all areas. I will be pleased to present this documentation when I meet with the special committee in Mumbai later this month. I can assure you sir that all my actions in this matter, and all others since my appointment, have been with the aim of improving the team performance toward developing a team that will represent India with distinctions in Test match and one-day cricket. As I said to you during our meeting in Colombo, I have serious reservations about the attitude of some players and about Sourav and his ability to take this team to a new high, and none of the things he has done since his reappointment has caused me to change my view. In fact, it has only served to confirm that it is time for him to move on and let someone else build their team toward the 2007 World Cup. This team has been made to be fearful and distrusting by the rumour mongering and deceit that is Sourav’s modus operandi of divide and rule. Certain players have been treated with favour, all of them bowlers, while others have been shunted up and down the order or left out of the team to suit Sourav’s whims. John Wright obviously allowed this to go on to the detriment of the team. I am not prepared to sit back and allow this to continue or we will get the same results we have been seeing for some time now. It is time that all players were treated with fairness and equity and that good behaviours and attitudes are rewarded at the selection table rather than punished. I can assure you of my very best intentions. Yours sincerely, Greg Chappell MBE